Thursday 31 March 2016

2015 Sets Record for Renewables Investment

  Top Signals End of Oil-Age

Global investment in renewable energy hit a record US$285.9bn (£202.3bn) in 2015, beating the previous high of $278.5bn set in 2011, a study shows.


UN: 2015 Record Year for Global Renewables Investment



The 10th Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment also showed that investment in developing nations exceeded that in developed countries.
In another first, more new renewables capacity than fossil-fuel generation came online during 2015.
But it warned that much more had to be done to avoid dangerous climate change.
The assessment, produced by the Frankfurt School-Unep Collaborating Centre for Climate and Sustainable Energy Finance and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, showed that the developing world committed a total of US$156bn (up 19% on 2014 levels) in renewables (excluding large hydro) while developed nations invested US$130bn (down 8% from 2014 levels).
"A large element in this turnaround was China, which lifted its investment by 17% to US$102.9bn, or 36% of the world total," the report observed.
However, other developing nations also contributed as six of the top 10 investors were developing nations.
In the foreword, UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon said the report's findings increased confidence that a low-carbon world was obtainable.
He wrote: "We have entered a new era of clean energy growth that can fuel a future of opportunity and greater prosperity for every person on the planet."
However, he warned that in order to avoid dangerous climate change required an "immediate shift away from fossil fuels".
Electricity generation, Germany (Getty Images)



Monday 28 March 2016

Peak Oil Today - March 28, 2016

"PEAK OIL TODAY"

The very best weekly analysis and evaluation of the global peak oil situation with additional briefings, charts and videos, added by the curator from accredited professional sources, to enhance the informed investor's knowledge and understanding of its deep complexities and evolving outlooks. 

Everyone should "Bookmark ' this very important weekly post to stay abreast of this most critical aspect of global economics and life on this planet.

Free Logo From Thefreelogomakers.com

 

Peak Oil Review – 28 March 2016 

By Tom Whipple

Association for the Study of Peak Oil USA


Quote of the Week
Going into summer, producers know it’s going to be a massacre.”

Sami Yahya, Platts Bentek - Analyst. 
Natural Gas
Contents
1.  Oil and the Global Economy
2.  The Middle East & North Africa
3.  China
4.  Russia/Ukraine
5. The Briefs


1.  Oil and the Global Economy



Oil prices finished a holiday-shortened trading week on Thursday relatively unchanged. Oil had been a bit higher on Monday and Tuesday but then underwent a $2 a barrel decline on Wednesday after the weekly stocks report showed a 9.4-million-barrel increase in the US crude inventory. Prices recovered by a dollar or so on Thursday to close at $39 in New York and $40 in London, partly in response to a 15-unit drop in the US oil rig count. The 50 percent price increase since January still seems to be based mostly on unrealistic expectations that the large oil exporters will cut production enough to bring supply and demand back into balance. So far, however, crude stocks have continued to rise, and production cuts have been minimal. 
 
The theory prevalent in recent weeks that the so-called “missing 800,000 b/d” of world oil production was behind the recent price rise was discounted by the IEA and a second major bank last week as wishful thinking.  There has always been a gap in following the world’s oil flows as many countries do not accurately report their production, consumption, and storage numbers. The IEA says that missing barrels is nothing unusual and has been present in the Agency’s accounting since it was formed.

The exporters meeting, which is to include Russia and much of OPEC, is still scheduled for April 17th in Doha. Given that the countries attending have little expectation of substantial production increases shortly, any decision about a production freeze reached at the meeting is unlikely to have an impact on the 1-2 million b/d of excess capacity that is still estimated to be flooding the market.
  
Unless there is major geopolitical upheaval such as a governmental collapse in Venezuela, Brazil, Nigeria, or Iraq, there is unlikely to be a major curtailment of the oil supply in the next six months.  While there has been a strong demand for gasoline in the US due to the low prices, this may fade as retail prices rise again. While China’s demand for crude oil has been strong recently, much of the increase in imports has been refined and exported as oil products to Asia thereby cutting demand by refineries elsewhere in Asia.
 
There clearly are bad times ahead for the future of the oil industry as it becomes apparent just how much capital spending has been cut on projects that were supposed to come into production later this decade. Last week saw a spate of stories outlining the woes of the industry. Consulting firm Wood Mackenzie says that some $500 billion worth oil and gas projects have been deferred due to low oil revenues -- up from $400 billion in the firm’s previous estimate. 
OPEC supply is expected to grow by some 300,000 b/d this year, mostly from Iran and Iraq. However, global demand for oil is expected to grow by a million b/d this year, gradually clearing away the excess supply and inventories so that by 2017 prices will be rising again.
  
The IEA is becoming concerned that unless there is a major increase in oil industry investments in 2017 and 2018, there will be a large increase in oil prices towards the end of the decade as supply can no longer meet demand. The Agency also expects that oil prices will average between $35 and $40 a barrel this year which is not enough to encourage a surge in investment in the short run.   In the meantime, the fiscal condition of much of the US shale oil industry continues to deteriorate as more loans become due and more companies declare bankruptcy. Many banks are reducing their exposure to the oil industry and the flow of capital that built and sustained US shale oil production is starting to dry up.
 
The US oil industry is expressing concern that recent actions by the Obama administration, such as the air quality regulations, blocking the XL pipeline, and stopping the sale of oil leases off the Atlantic coast signifies that the government is more concerned about the environment than the economic well-being of the industry.  The industry sees several technical regulations that are well below the radar of most observers as pointing to an effort to slow oil production. As is normal, there is little concern about the ever-increasing environmental problems the world is facing.


READ MORE

http://peak-oil.org/peak-oil-review-28-mar-2016/


Sunday 27 March 2016

OIL Prices Retrace on Slower GDP

Oil  Prices Mixed on U.S. GDP Data

Crude oil prices are down about 2.4 percent for the week after showing recovery.

NEW YORK, March 25 (UPI) -- Crude oil prices were mixed in the early stages of Friday trading after figures showed fourth quarter growth in the United States had slowed.
The U.S. Commerce Department reported real gross domestic production increased at an annual rate of 1.4 percent during the fourth quarter, compared with 2.0 percent GDP growth during third quarter 2015.
Crude oil prices faced negative pressure earlier this week amid signs of slow hiring in the United States. Brent crude oil was relatively flat in early Friday trading at $40.50 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark price for crude oil, was down 0.5 percent to $39.59 per barrel. Trading was light because of observations for the Good Friday religious holiday on the Christian calendar.
While a slight revision upward from previous reports, the Commerce Department said corporate profits declined for the second straight quarter. For full-year 2015, the department estimated the economy grew at a rate of 2.4 percent, the same rate as the previous year.
READ MORE

Friday 25 March 2016

How Much Demand Deconstruction From EVs?

Lower Forever: Electric Cars and the Inevitable Reality of the Oil Market


Proponents of the Electric Car are already convinced that the advent of cars with plugs will ultimately spell doom for the Big Oil companies and countries that rely on oil exports.  Meanwhile the oil industry, led by OPEC, is expecting steady growth through at least 2040.  But what will it take for the rest of the market to “see the light” and accept the fact that demand for oil will soon peak and slowly erode?
In this report I will examine the fundamentals of oil demand destruction from a markets perspective.  Using a combination of conservative estimates, educated guesses, and market insights I will quantify the amount of PEV sales needed to cause enough oil demand destruction necessary to change the long term outlook of the oil market.  Furthermore, assuming an “S” shaped growth curve I will provide insights as to how long it might take for this shift in market psychology to occur.
n late 2014 through 2015 a worldwide oversupply of crude oil existed mostly in the order of 1 to 2 million barrels per day according to the EIA.  WTI Crude Oil sold off from well over $100 in mid-2014 to under $27 a barrel in February of 2016.  As a result of the prolonged oversupply and pricing pressure, oil companies drastically slashed capital expenditures, reduced workforces and reluctantly accepted the “lower for longer”mantra.
But what would it take for the market to accept what electric car advocates already believe – that prices and demand for oil will remain Lower Forever?  To begin with, the market needs to observe enough oil demand destruction to conclude that electric cars are having a significant impact on market fundamentals.  If this can be observed in the context of an “S” shaped growth curve, market participants will quickly realize that oil will soon reach Peak Demand and then begin falling.  A huge psychological threshold will be crossed when electric cars beginning displacing about 50% of annual oil demand growth.  At that point it will be pretty obvious that oil consumption will inevitably begin a steady decline.

Monday 21 March 2016

"Peak Oil Today" - March 21, 2016

MARKET IMPLICATIONS

Solar shift: 

With more than a million US houses set to have solar panels by the end of next month, grid managers serving the eastern US plan to cut the amount of electricity they buy from conventional plants by about 1,400 megawatts, starting in 2019, according to industry consultant ICF International Inc. That’s enough juice to power about 780,000 households. The result could be as much as $2 billion in lost revenue for generators that are already reeling from lower demand, tight environmental regulation, and depressed prices.  


"PEAK OIL TODAY"

The very best weekly analysis and evaluation of the global peak oil situation with additional briefings, charts and videos, added by the curator from accredited professional sources, to enhance the informed investor's knowledge and understanding of its deep complexities and evolving outlooks. 

Everyone should "Bookmark ' this very important weekly post to stay abreast of this most critical aspect of global economics and life on this planet.

Free Logo From Thefreelogomakers.com

 

Peak Oil Review – 21 March 2016 

By Tom Whipple

Association for the Study of Peak Oil USA


Quote of the Week
It could be a lot of years before you see any meaningful rebound in the dividend [of oil companies]. It’s tough to have a really conservative, stable investment in a business that can’t control the price of its own product.”
Josh Peters, Editor, 
 Morningstar Inc.’s DividendInvestor Newsletter
Contents
1.  Oil and the Global Economy
2.  The Middle East & North Africa
3.  China
4.  Russia/Ukraine
5. The Briefs


1.  Oil and the Global Economy

The price rally that has been on-going since mid-February continued last week with US futures closing Friday at $39.44 a barrel, up 2.4 percent for the week, and London futures closing at $41.20 up 2 percent. Last week the move came from a combination of what one analyst termed a “brilliant communications strategy” and other developments that normally lead to higher prices. The “brilliant communications strategy,” of course, is the meeting in April during which those countries that either cannot or do not want to increase oil production are supposed to agree not to increase their production. During the week, Moscow even hinted that Iran might join the group after it increases its oil output to 4 million b/d, a goal that might take many months or even years to reach. The producers now are scheduled to meet on 17 April in Qatar; the meeting is being heralded as the first agreement to limit global oil production in 15 years even though it is unlikely to have any real impact on oil production.
There was, however, some news last week of the kind that moves oil prices. The US Federal Reserve announced that its plan to increase US interest rates is likely to be more limited than previously announced. This news pushed down the dollar and moved oil prices higher. US crude stocks grew by only 1.3 million barrels the week before last which was the smallest gain in the last five weeks. The markets ignored the storms in the Gulf of Mexico that week which restricted imports. Traders continue to watch the US rig count, which last week fell to an all-time low of 476, down from 1,069 a year ago and 4,530 back in 1981. Rigs drilling for oil last week increased by one rig which is meaningless, but brought hopes of higher prices to the markets. Although oil production in the US continues to slip, the resilience of the industry has been remarkable considering the low prices and the number of rigs continuing to drill for oil.
The mystery of 800,000 b/d of missing oil has some analysts wondering if the IEA’s story of a 1-2 million b/d surplus in world oil production has been overblown. They are saying that supply and demand could be much closer to being in balance than most believe. It seems that last year 800,000 b/d of what was thought to be surplus oil production did not end up in OECD storage tanks when the year was over. There are several possible reasons for this. Oil could be going to storage in tanks outside of the OECD inventory count; oil production was lower than estimated, or oil consumption was actually higher.  If the 800,000 b/d never existed and were only the result of bad accounting and misestimates, then we should be much closer to a global rebalance and price rebound than currently forecast.
Bad news for the oil industry, such as bankruptcies, restrictions on financing, or large cutbacks in capital spending, continues to be announced daily. At some point in the coming years, there clearly will be some major drops in production unless capital spending and drilling for new oil increases rapidly, depletion will take its toll.
Natural Gas 11 March 2016
Natural gas prices which have been below $2 per million BTUs since mid-February and at one point were trading around $1.65, rebounded to close at $1.90 last week. These prices, of course, still are well below the actual costs of production, which is why we are starting to see a reduction in the-drilling-for-gas rig count and gas production.
READ MORE

Thursday 17 March 2016

Saudi Aramco, Shell Marriage - Parting is Such Sweet Sorrow

  Cash-Strapped Saudi's Reshaping  Itself

 “This partnership made sense when it was formed but things have changed and the market conditions have changed, so it makes sense for this partnership to be dissolved,” Auers said. 


 "It makes fundamental sense.”

Saudi Aramco, Shell to Break Up 18-Year U.S. Refining Marriage


Image result for aramco shell

Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Saudi Arabian Oil Co. are ending an 18-year refining partnership as the Anglo-Dutch titan prepares to sell billions of dollars of assets and the Middle East nation’s state oil company weighs an initial public offering.

Image result for aramco shellShell will assume control of two Louisiana refineries operated by the Motiva Enterprises LLC joint venture, as well as nine fuel terminals and rights to Shell-branded markets in Florida, Louisiana and the U.S. Northeast, the companies said Wednesday in a statement. Aramco will retain the Motiva name and take ownership of the largest U.S. refinery in Port Arthur, Texas, along with 26 terminals and exclusive license to sell fuel under the Shell brand across Texas and much of the U.S. Midwest and Southeast.

Shell will get some cash from Aramco following the split, a first step in The Hague-based company’s plan to sell $30 billion of assets in three years, a spokesman said. Chief Executive Officer Ben Van Beurden has pledged to raise money from divestments to help maintain dividends and recover some of the cost of buying BG Group Plc. Aramco, the world’s biggest oil producer, is exploring plans for an IPO that may give it a value of as much as five times that of Apple Inc., according to Bloomberg Intelligence.

“These assets ranked probably in the bottom quartile of Shell’s portfolio and they are going to be moved,” Fadel Gheit, an Oppenheimer & Co. analyst, said in a telephone interview on Wednesday. “They’ve got to fund the dividend.”

Aramco Options


Motiva, formed in 1998, has the capacity to process more than 1 million barrels of crude per day, and is the largest Saudi Aramco investment in the U.S. It’s been plagued by cost overruns and construction delays that eroded profits, Gheit said. The Port Arthur refinery suffered leaks and fires that delayed a $10 billion expansion to double the size of the plant.

The refineries Shell will own probably have a value of $4.35 billion and will generate about $800 million this year in earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, Cowen and Co. LLC analysts including Sam Margolin said in a note to clients on Thursday. “The split aligns with” Shell’s strategy, the analysts said.

Options being considered by Aramco for the IPO include selling shares in the parent company, placing its domestic and overseas downstream joint ventures into a holding company and selling shares in that, or grouping together the companies joint ventures and smaller refineries, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.


Gasoline Output


“The division of Motiva will also make it easier for Saudi Aramco to sell part of a wholly-owned downstream asset in any future public offering instead of going through the long legality and pricing process with an international joint venture partner,” said Mohamed Ramady, a London-based independent analyst and former professor of economics at King Fahd University for Petroleum and Minerals in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Image result for aramco shellThe division of assets will increase Shell’s capacity to produce gasoline, which “is likely to attract premium pricing, particularly during driving season,” Jason Gammel, a London-based analyst at Jefferies International Ltd., wrote in a report. It’s exposure to fuels like diesel and jet fuels will decrease, according to the report.

Shell and Aramco signed a letter of intent, the statement showed. A final agreement has yet to be reached, and no terms were released. The companies are still working on the amount of cash Shell will get from Aramco, the Shell spokesman said.

Van Beurden “has a very busy two years ahead of him and Simon is going to be cracking his calculator,” Gheit said, referring to Shell Chief Financial Officer Simon Henry.

Different Goals


Shell’s U.S.-traded depositary receipts have increased about 8.5 percent this year, outperforming the other four so-called supermajor oil companies: Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp., Total SA and BP Plc.

A former partner in Motiva, Chevron exited the partnership in 2002 as part of a settlement with regulators that allowed it to acquire Texaco Inc. Chevron’s divestment left Shell and the Saudis as 50-50 partners in the venture.

Shell and Saudi Aramco were already pursuing divergent goals within Motiva, John Auers, executive vice president at Turner Mason & Co., said in a telephone interview. The Texas plant that Aramco will own processes large quantities of Saudi oil; the Louisiana plants to be controlled by Shell refine mostly offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and nothing from Saudi fields, he said.

“This partnership made sense when it was formed but things have changed and the market conditions have changed, so it makes sense for this partnership to be dissolved,” Auers said. 

 " It makes fundamental sense.”